Posted on
August 02, 2011 by
admin
Anne edited the following
Q&A: Will you become a terrorist in the future?
Wait,….give me time;
Many have said in the wake of 9/11 that the “War on Terror” was only temporarily reserved for the “Muslim extremists” but would soon include any nationality, religion, or demographic that stood in the way of the globalists’ megalomaniacal designs.
As we develop our knowledge of the real world around us, we begin to understand the key to real freedom – self-sufficiency and independence on a personal and local level. Realizing that real freedom also stands in the way of the globalists’ designs, it was only inevitable that any attempt to become independent of their burgeoning world-spanning empire, would “make the list” of terroristic activities as well.
While it is easy to understand a narrative of terrorism that includes bomb-vest wearing foreigners infiltrating our cities and killing people on their way to work, it becomes increasingly difficult to understand as the definition of terrorism is shifted toward you and me. (which was predicted by many commentators after 9/11)
Recently, Zero Hedge reported on the FBI’s conviction of Bernard von NotHaus, an American who was minting his own money. This was not counterfeited US currency, rather it was a private, competing currency backed with precious metals.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/fbi-busts-mastermind-criminal-issuing-silver-currency-demanding-repeal-fed-and-irs-faces-15-
The FBI specifically mentioned “terrorism” in relation to Mr. von NotHaus’s case.
‘Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism,’ U.S. Attorney Tompkins said in announcing the verdict. ‘While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country,’ she added. ‘We are determined to meet these threats through infiltration, disruption, and dismantling of organizations which seek to challenge the legitimacy of our democratic form of government.
http://www.fbi.gov/charlotte/press-releases/2011/defendant-convicted-of-minting-his-own-currency
However, the Federal Reserve note is not legitimate currency in any shape, form or way, legally, economically, or ideologically. The US Constitution has solely given Congress the duty to issue the nation’s currency and set its value.
See article 1, section 8:
http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html
The threat von NotHaus posed was not to the US economy, nor the US Constitution, but rather to the corporations that have hijacked and monopolized them. By offering Americans an alternative to the private banking cartel’s collapsing fiat currency, von NotHaus gave us an opportunity to entirely replace this corrupt system, become independent once again as a nation and restore the US Constitution.
Is that terrorism?
By labeling men like von NotHaus a terrorist, the prospect of shifting the poorly justified American police-state toward activists challenging corporate interests becomes an alarming possibility.
It becomes clear that geopolitical domination facilitated by the very fake “War on Terror” is only one step in a larger plan. As the globalists fight on to destroy the nation-state worldwide, they fight domestically to destroy self-sufficiency and independence.
Just as foreign nations become terrorist extremists for resisting the oligarchs globally, we are becoming domestic and economic terrorists for resisting them on the home front.
So, what are you going to do?
Will YOU become a ‘terrorist’ or will you fall into line and obey?
All thoughts welcome,..even the most absurd.
Read the rest of this entry →